Vs > Lower Hutt, Gracefield
| Mt Makulu vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield Climate & Distance Between | |
Mt Makulu vs Circleville, Oh, Usa
Mt Makulu vs Treviso, Italy
Mt Makulu vs Launceston Wso, Australia
Mt Makulu vs Basel, Switzerland
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Murmansk, Russia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Benin, Benin
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Baruuhturuun, Mongolia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Skikda, Algeria
Oolitic, In vs Cabrobo
Newkirk, Ok vs Vitoria
Tateyama vs Dijon
Amarillo, Texas vs Zaragoza, Aragon
- The distance between Mt Makulu, Zambia and Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand is approximately 12,831 km or 7,973 mi.
- To reach Mt Makulu in this distance one would set out from Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 215.9° or SW and follow the great circles arc to approach Mt Makulu bearing 332.8° or NNW .
- Mt Makulu has a humid subtropical climate with dry winters (Cwa) whereas Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb).
- Mt Makulu is in or near the subtropical dry forest biome whereas Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome.
- The average annual temperature is 7.2 °C (13°F) warmer.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 0.2 °C (0.4°F) less in Mt Makulu. The continentality subtype is barely hyperoceanic for both.
- Total annual precipitation averages 458.9 mm (18.1 in) less which is equivalent to 458.9 l/m² (11.26 US gal/ft²) or 4,589,000 l/ha (490,595 US gal/ac) less. About 2/3 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 22.6° higher in Mt Makulu than in Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Mt Makulu relative to Lower Hutt, Gracefield. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Mt Makulu.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
+4 (+8) |
+4 (+7) |
+5 (+9) |
+6 (+11) |
+7 (+12) |
+6 (+11) |
+7 (+13) |
+9 (+17) |
+12 (+21) |
+12 (+21) |
+9 (+17) |
+6 (+10) |
|
+7 (+13) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
+130 (+5) |
+123 (+5) |
+2 (+0) |
-86 (-3) |
-132 (-5) |
-142 (-6) |
-158 (-6) |
-139 (-5) |
-113 (-4) |
-79 (-3) |
+31 (+1) |
+103 (+4) |
|
-459 (-18) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
-1h 47' |
-1h 06' |
-0h 12' |
+0h 45' |
+1h 35' |
+2h 00' |
+1h 49' |
+1h 06' |
+0h 10' |
-0h 47' |
-1h 36' |
-2h 00' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
+16.3 |
+24.7 |
+25.5 |
+25.6 |
+25.5 |
+25.6 |
+25.7 |
+25.8 |
+25.7 |
+24.7 |
+16.1 |
+9.9 |
| +22.6 |
Url to share!
Mt Makulu vs Essendon, Australia
Mt Makulu vs Wellington Aero, New Zealand
Mt Makulu vs Suwa, Japan
Mt Makulu vs Haikou, China
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Cadiz, Spain
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Kurgan, Russia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Cotui, Dominican Republic
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Shionomisaki, Japan
Wairakei vs Memphis, Tennessee
Davenport, Wa vs Miskolc
Aayanbulag vs Barcelos
Vicenza vs Aj-Petri
Mt Makulu vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|